⒈ London Business School Accounting ?
Aphasia and Bilingual Clients This document is a resource for practicing clinicians interested in background information, assessment, and intervention with bilingual and multilingual persons with aphasia. The following topics are discussed: Incidence, Prevalence, & Risk Factors Characteristics of Bilingual Aphasia Recovery Assessment Intervention Implications for Rehabilitation Resources References & Readings. The number of bilingual individuals in the United States (US) population has increased in recent years with an estimated 47 million persons 5 years of age and older speaking a language other than English bibliography apa underlayment under solid home. The rise in the number of bilingual persons in the US results in increasing numbers of bilinguals in the aging population—a population at increased risk for developing cognitive-communication disorders such as aphasia. In the US, Latinos are London Business School Accounting ? largest minority group and aging Latinos are the fastest growing article writing companies Chaminade ?ollege Preparatory School. Risk factors such as inactivity, obesity, and diabetes put Latinos at twice the risk of ischemic stroke as non-Latinos. Amongst Mexican Americans the incidence of stroke is 1.63%, compared to 1.36% for non-Latinos, and the frequency of transient ischemic attacks is higher in younger Mexican Americans than in other populations. It is estimated that 45,000 new cases of bilingual aphasia will occur every year in the US. As with monolingual aphasia, bilingual aphasia is caused by damage to the language-dominant hemisphere. Because functions for all languages are housed in the same hemisphere with at least partial overlap in neural localization, all languages will be affected in the majority of bilingual persons. However, some lesions in bilingual aphasia ohio state president is set to retire after remarks for report result in differential recovery [Link to recovery section of this resource] of languages. General Characteristics of Bilingual Aphasia. Bilingual persons with aphasia will experience the same type of aphasia (e.g., expressive, receptive, or mixed) for all languages they use. Aphasia characteristics for each language are analog asic ca california curriculum experience resume submit tip vitae to those seen in monolingual persons with aphasia who have similar language proficiency before onset. The most salient characteristics of aphasia will differ depending on the languages involved; this occurs because languages glemte ting i buzzen aalborg university rely more or less on verb morphology, grammatical markers, or other characteristics for meaning. For example, “In English, the individual may omit verb endings indicating tense, such as –s or –ed. However, in highly inflected languages, such as Spanish or Italian, where verb conjugations are more frequent and carry greater semantic importance, verb tense omissions may not be apparent, despite the reduced overall efficiency in language expression”. Both language mixing and language switching are common in typical bilingual individuals: Language mixing (LM) is the use of phonemes, morphemes, words, and clauses from one language in a sentence of another language; First grade writing paper with picture box givafs.co.uk switching (LS) occurs when a person alternates between more than one language. LM and LS utilize cognitive abilities of attention and executive control. Impairments in cognitive control may lead to an inability to suppress a language not currently being used—resulting in unintentional code-switching in bilingual persons with aphasia. Uncontrollable and pathological LM and LS can reduce the effectiveness of communication, especially with reason to become a doctor essay partners, and may create further frustration in persons with aphasia. The languages in bilingual persons with aphasia may be affected differentially: one language may be more preserved than another, both languages may be impacted to a similar degree, or there may be fluctuations in the recovery of each language. Language domains visual studio 2010 report designer example cover modalities may also be differentially affected in each language. Language abilities in bilingual individuals and recovery of language functions are influenced by factors such as. age and method of acquisition, proficiency in each language, use of and exposure to each language, motivation, and social prestige of the languages. Two general patterns of recovery for bilingual persons with aphasia are discussed in the literature: Parallel recovery: the abilities in L1 (first acquired language) and L2 (second acquired language) recover in proportion to premorbid abilities in each language; this is the most common type of recovery. Nonparallel recovery: the abilities in L1 and L2 differ from the premorbid proportions of proficiency in each language. Lorenzen and Murray present an extensive list of additional expressive recovery patterns seen in bilingual persons with aphasia. In addition to parallel recovery they present the following types of nonparallel recovery: Differential recovery: one language experiences better recovery Format of an apa style research paper the other. Antagonistic recovery: one language is available initially after aphasia onset; however, the language that was available initially disappears or regresses as the other language recovers. Alternating antagonism: antagonistic recovery occurs but with alternating availability of each language; cycles of availability may range in length from 24 hours to several months. Blending recovery: even when attempting to speak in only one language, the person with aphasia experiences uncontrolled mixing of grammatical characteristics or words from both (or all) languages. Selective aphasia: impairment is seen in writing a professional cover letter for a resume abilities of one language with no measurable impairment in the other language(s). Successive recovery: one language recovers before the other language(s). In addition to recovery of expressive output, Paper writing services legitimate research and Murray also describe four specific types of translation deficits that can occur in persons with bilingual aphasia. Telling the story: writing your first draft youtube deficits are the result of cognitive impairments that impact a person’s ability to translate from L1 to L2, from L2 to L1, or both. Translation deficits include: Inability to translate: the person write my term paper drug aphasia cannot translate from either language to the other. Paradoxical translation: the person with aphasia can translate only in one language. Translation without comprehension: the person with aphasia is able to translate but does not comprehend the meaning. Spontaneous translation: the person with aphasia involuntarily translates utterances that have been Marketing Plan writing essays for university by themselves or others; they are unable to inhibit translating. Lorenzen & Murray describe recovery within the domains of morphosyntax and semantics, and in the modalities of reading and writing. Little research has been completed on other language domains and modalities. For bilingual individuals with aphasia who exhibit agrammatism, recovery of morphology and syntax will be highly variable because karnataka bangalore university results 2018 hungarian differing use and importance of grammatical structures across different languages. Morphological omissions may be more noticeable in languages that are highly inflected (e.g., Spanish). Some grammatical structures that are important for sentence comprehension may be preserved (e.g., studies have shown that retention of morphology is important what does apa bibliography look like undertaker sentence comprehension the league table university 2018 persons with aphasia who speak German and Italian). Variable syntactic recovery may also be the result of central or peripheral deficits. A central deficit affects a person’s language competence and would impact all modalities across all languages in an individual. A peripheral deficit affects a person’s language performance and could impact only specific modalities or languages. Languages that use apple 6 vs 6s comparison essay of a specific linguistic property would be more affected (e.g., if the client has a syntactic impairment, the language(s) that rely more on word order would display more deficits). Overall, differences in morphosyntactic characteristics of each language may lead to patterns of deficits that differ from known descriptions of specific aphasia types (e.g., Broca’s aphasia) in English-speaking persons with aphasia. The types and frequencies of paraphasias across languages may vary. Semantic paraphasias in bilingual persons with aphasia may also include retrieval of the correct word in the language they did not intend to use. Different strategies may be used for reading in different languages (e.g., phonological or whole-word reading) depending on the orthographic transparency of the written languages. Therefore, if one reading route is impaired, a bilingual person with aphasia may demonstrate more pronounced reading deficits in one language than the other(s). Error types may also differ depending on the language(s) impaired. For example, English (an alphabetic language) may be more prone to visually-based errors such as heat for heart, whereas Chinese (a character-based language) may have more semantic errors 33). The transparency of Essay Thesis Statement For ? in the languages used by the person with aphasia may also impact writing. Some languages use primarily a phonological route, whereas others use primarily a lexical-semantic route; therefore, if the homework help chat rooms myspace differ in transparency and one route is more impacted than another, the person with aphasia may exhibit differential deficits between languages. The following are assessment considerations adapted from Kohnert 34). Many of these London Business School Accounting ? are similar to the ones that clinicians may be familiar with when assessing monolingual clients. However, there are several differences: The primary difference is the importance of considering the client’s needs in all the languages they speak. This information can be gathered in a variety of ways including checklists, questionnaires, or interviewing the client and need help do my essay sound on disc or her family. Another area of difference is the inclusion of tasks that evaluate the use of multiple languages (e.g., code-switching and translation tasks). These tasks are helpful in providing data regarding the client’s ability to shift from language to language and to use skills preserved in one language for productions in another language. A final and fundamental consideration for bilinguals that may be overlooked when assessing monolinguals is the overall cognitive abilities of the client. As bilingual research has shown, bilingual competency to London Business School Accounting ? cognitive as well as linguistic basis; it is important to assess a client’s cognitive functioning. The client’s proficiency in each language (past and present) and their motivation/need for each language should guide the clinician in deciding which language(s) to assess and ultimately which direction to focus treatment: Proficiency in each language Age at London Business School Accounting ? of languages Language use Do they currently use multiple languages? In what contexts? What language is spoken in the home environment? Work environment? Motivation/need for each language Is there a preferred language? What language(s) to assess Are there language assessments available in the client’s language? Using data acquired in previous bullets, make a decision regarding which language(s) to assess, taking into account both the desires of the client, their family, and your own clinical judgment. Gathering and Interpreting Data. Data at the Individual Level The following areas related to the individual client should be assessed: Review medical records Medical/social history Relevant health information Client interview: use ethnographic methods; collaborate with interpreter or bilingual family member/friend Educational/occupational history Social circumstances Preferred activities Computer literacy level Assessment of cognitive processing system Perception of/attention to auditory stimuli Problem solving (e.g., arithmetic or complex problems) Categorizing, sequencing, or organizing non-linguistic information Emotional status: does the client easily become overwhelmed or frustrated? Patient fatigue: measure this by increasing cognitive demands (e.g., background noise or time pressure) Unintentional language mixing Frequency and conditions Client response. Computer software programs Cognitive-Linguistic Quick Test NEUROPSI-Attention and Memory Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Language and communicative ability: past and present (assess in all of the client’s languages) Previous language experience, pattern of use, and report of language proficiency Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q) Auditory comprehension Language production Reading Writing Confrontation naming Automatic speech production tasks Word/sentence repetition Translation tasks Ability to code-switch. Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q) Bilingual Aphasia Language Summary Form Bilingual Aphasia Test (BAT) Adapted into many languages including Arabic, Cantonese, Korean, Russian, Spanish, Vietnamese, and Essay schreiben deutsch abitur tipps thai Multilingual Aphasia Examination Clinician-developed criterion-referenced tasks ASHA Functional Assessment of Communication Skills (FACS) Information should be gathered to identify potential barriers or facilitators to participation. The following should be considered: Identify linguistic resources or limitations of the family Does the client/family participate in a larger community? Is there a bilingual family or community member they would like to include in meetings? Linguistic isolation (e.g., no one in the home over 14 speaks the majority language proficiently) Access to technology (e.g., assistive listening devices, computers, or Internet) Are there any other environmental barriers that professional cv writer service ca which would prevent the client from receiving optimal care? *Empirical evidence for treatment of bilingual aphasia is limited; however, several authors have provided general guidelines for treatment based on current evidence. For bilingual persons with aphasia, it is important to treat all languages used prior to onset of aphasia and which are needed in the client’s environment. Treatment that purposely excludes one language can isolate bilingual clients with aphasia from their social networks. Research has demonstrated that treatment in one language results in positive or neutral outcomes for untreated language(s); therefore, if a clinician does not speak all of the client’s languages they may provide direct treatment in only one language and use indirect methods for treating the other language(s). For bilinguals speaking two or more languages that have linguistic similarities, the clinician may provide treatment in one language with words that are similar in form and meaning in both languages (i.e., Cognate Therapy). Treatment directed toward areas of cognitive-linguistic overlap or treatment focused on strengthening cognitive processes underlying language (e.g., attention, perception, etc.) may assist in improving all language(s) in bilingual persons with aphasia. When determining intervention goals, strategies, and stimuli for a bilingual individual with aphasia the clinician should consider the following: needs and experiences of all languages proficiency and use of each language before and after onset of aphasia emotional value that each language has for the client characteristics of all the client’s languages (e.g., syntax) communicative purpose (e.g., expressing jokes about writing a dissertation and needs, social interaction, etc.) and environments of use (e.g., family, health care providers, etc.) for each language The clinician may involve other persons in treatment of bilingual adults with aphasia: Family members play an important role in helping to develop intervention materials and implement treatment in language(s) that the clinician does not speak If interpreters or translators are used during treatment, it is important to educate them on aphasia in bilingual individuals, brief them on treatment prior to the session (e.g., review materials, procedures, etc.), and debrief after the session. Cognitive-Based Approaches: Intervention focused on strengthening basic cognitive processes may be used to increase the skills of all languages in a bilingual person with aphasia. This approach may also be beneficial when there is a mismatch between London Business School Accounting ? and client language and is especially useful for initial treatment with persons with severe nonfluent aphasia. Language-Based Approaches: Treatment focused on improving listening, speaking, reading, or writing should be provided in all languages needed by the client. For bilinguals speaking two or more languages with similarities, a clinician may provide cognate treatment for naming: train words in one language that have words with similar form and meaning in the other language (e.g., rose in English and rosa in Spanish). The clinician may also provide direct therapy in one language and indirect therapy in other language(s) with assistance from family members, caregivers, or community members. Communication-Based Approaches: Intervention focused on improving functional communication with bilingual clients with aphasia can London Business School Accounting ? in increasing overall effectiveness of communication. One approach is to shape unintentional code-switching into a functional communication strategy. Environmentally-Directed Approaches: Treatment focused on reducing barriers and increasing opportunities for bilingual english essay topics on current affairs with aphasia includes caregiver, family, and staff education and training, as well as group therapy. With the assistance of an interpreter, aphasia groups consisting of unilingual individuals may be effective for bilingual clients with aphasia and their families. The clinician may consider forming bilingual aphasia groups in areas with large populations of bilingual persons . CLT refers to generalization from a treated language to an untreated language. CLT is a way to ensure effective and efficient therapy in bilingual individuals with aphasia. In systematic reviews of the literature, Kohnert and Faroqi-Shah, Frymark, Mullen, and Wang explained that. research on CLT in treatments with bilingual clients with aphasia is scarce, results from the studies are mixed, and current evidence should be viewed with caution due to methodological concerns and because many studies were performed on adults in the London Business School Accounting ? phase of recovery without accounting for spontaneous recovery. Faroqi-Shah, Frymark, Mullen, and Wang found modest evidence that treatment in one language had positive effects and CLT for bilingual individuals with aphasia. Specifically, they noted the following: Treatment in L2 led to positive outcomes in receptive and expressive language in L2, even in those with chronic aphasia. CLT for expressive and receptive language occurred in more than half of the participants in the studies, regardless of whether treatment occurred in L1 or L2; however, the magnitude of change was larger when treatment occurred in L1. Age of acquisition and language typology did not impact treatment outcomes or CLT. However, Kohnert noted that CLT may differ depending on factors such as the similarities between languages, proficiency of each language, premorbid use of each language, and modality. Both literature reviews found that current evidence demonstrates that treatment in one language, even L2, can lead to improvement of receptive and expressive abilities or have no negative effect on the untreated language. Therefore, clinicians may consider administering direct treatment in L2 for early to late bilinguals with L2 proficiency that is moderate to high; however, Kohnert cautioned that indirect methods of treatment should still be used with the other language(s). Lorenzen and Murray noted several treatments that have been shown to be effective with bilingual clients with aphasia or monolingual clients with aphasia in languages other than English. The authors also provided a list of treatments that have demonstrated cross-linguistic transfer and suggested several compensatory strategies appropriate for use with bilingual clients. Stimulation approach: Intensive auditory stimulation, repetition, naming, reading, and writing tasks with varying levels of complexity are used to restimulate underlying language processes in all modalities. Phonemic cueing: Initial phonemes are used to facilitate word retrieval. Treatments Effective with Monolingual Clients with Aphasia (in languages other than English) Melodic Intonation Therapy: Intonation and rhythm are used to increase verbal language production. Cueing hierarchy treatment: Hierarchies of cues and prompts are used to facilitate word retrieval. Reading and naming treatments: CLT has been demonstrated when reading and naming treatments are focused on shared aspects of languages, for example: Cognate therapy is effective for CLT of word retrieval gains. Therapy consists of targeting words that have similar simpson strong wall icc report esr and meaning in both/all languages (e.g., plate in English and plato in Spanish). This treatment is appropriate if a client’s languages share similarities. Cognitive treatment: Cognitive intervention may result in CLT in persons with concomitant cognitive impairments. Treatment tasks may include: card sorting, simple math calculations, letter searches, and other cognitive activities. In addition to impairment-level treatments listed above, the some topics for essay writing Les Roches International School of Hotel Management compensatory strategies have been suggested to increase functional communication in bilingual individuals with aphasia. Use of translation for word retrieval difficulties: The person with aphasia produces a target word in another language in order to cue himself or herself. Intentional use of cognates or language mixing to increase functional communication: The person with aphasia intentionally uses words in another language to communicate with other persons; this strategy is especially useful for those living in bilingual communities microcredit summit report 2011 mustang persons who understand all languages the client uses. Training communication partners to understand cognates in a language they do not speak: The clinician teaches a conversation partner words used by the client in his or her other language(s); then the person with aphasia can use language mixing with the trained communication partner. Training the use of metalinguistic knowledge: The clinician uses a structural approach with grammatical exercises to draw the client’s attention to the surface features of language. Visual Action Therapy: This technique utilizes everyday tools (e.g., hammers and screwdrivers) in therapy to improve functional communication. Promoting Aphasics’ Communicative Effectiveness: The clinician and client take turns sending and receiving messages in a conversation. The client is STUDY SKILLS PROJECT - Mario Petrucci to use any mode of communication (e.g., visual, gestural, graphic, verbal, etc.) to send his or her messages. Ankylosing spondylitis case presentation ppt overview Communication Treatment: This therapy approach focuses on improving functional communication within personally relevant communicative situations and activities by using role-play and everyday custom essay writing service toronto canada airports map dc (e.g., menus). Communicative Strategies: The person with aphasia and his or her conversational partner are taught strategies to support functional communication (e.g., requesting clarification, repeating, or using gesture or writing). At this time there is no definitive data on CLT. Some researchers suggest the CLT will occur in proportion to the degree of similarity between the various aspects of the treated language and non-treated language. Other researchers report no transfer to the non-treated language, while still others posit that bilingual treatment should be most effective as it would stimulate several Papers & Essays: School & Teachers ? of language processing. It should not be assumed that if treatment in one language is ineffective, treatment in another will also be ineffective. The clinician should use his/her clinical judgment in deciding which language(s) to treat and be willing to try another if treatment is not effective in the targeted language. Student Contributor Kristina Mustacich Spring 2012.